Tanzamook Reality
Update: Developer Ry Koteen has posted a comment on this blog.
Let’s take a look at the Tanzamook architectural rendering compared to what’s appeared less than a block from my 1927 home. In this CAD-rendered image, the existing tree appears to be about twice as tall as the building. I added the red arrow.

Now that they’ve put another level on since my last post, along with cheap-looking stairs to the roof, you can see the reality of the building’s scale compared to the tree’s actual height.

I stood on the top of the stairs of the beautiful, historic condo across the street to shoot this image. If anything, the tree looks taller compared to the building from the camera’s perspective. Yet it’s still obvious that we were fooled by the rendering. The building is about 3/4 as tall as the tree. Also, the other trees in the image are fakes. Maybe they’ll get planted and grow that tall in 50 years. I believe that this monstrosity was not accurately depicted during planning and approval.
In other news, the Tanzamook website has lots of new text. Take a look. One of the parts that piqued my interest is the claim that “Tanzamook Project earned 482 points” on an Earth Advantage scorecard, “far supassing [sic] the minimum requirements” for a house. Are they trying to use the scorecard designated for one house for a ten condo project? That would be an incredibly disingenous manipulation of its customers to claim “sustainability.” And not surprising at all, if true.









